Current:Home > NewsPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K. -Wealth Legacy Solutions
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
Poinbank Exchange View
Date:2025-03-11 08:25:10
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (178)
Related
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- First August 2023 full moon coming Tuesday — and it's a supermoon. Here's what to know.
- Why JoJo Siwa No Longer Regrets Calling Out Candace Cameron Bure
- Pregnancy after 40 and factors you should weigh when making the decision: 5 Things podcast
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Helicopter crashes near I-70 in Ohio, killing pilot and causing minor accidents, police say
- Commanders ban radio hosts from training camp over 'disparaging remarks' about female reporter
- Expand your workspace and use your iPad as a second screen without any cables. Here's how.
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- How Motherhood Taught Kylie Jenner to Rethink Plastic Surgery and Beauty Standards
Ranking
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- EV Sales Continue to Soar, But a Surge in Production Could Lead to a Glut for Some Models
- Why JoJo Siwa No Longer Regrets Calling Out Candace Cameron Bure
- Rams RB Sony Michel, two-time Super Bowl champ, retires at 28 after 5 NFL seasons
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Inside Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick's Unusual Love Story
- Backup driver of an autonomous Uber pleads guilty to endangerment in pedestrian death
- From trash-strewn beach to artwork: How artists are raising awareness of plastic waste
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
The 75th Emmy Awards show has been postponed
Weighted infant sleepwear is meant to help babies rest better. Critics say it's risky
Kevin Spacey found not guilty on all charges in U.K. sexual assault trial
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
Nightengale's Notebook: Cardinals in a new 'awful' position as MLB trade deadline sellers
Why Eva Mendes and Ryan Gosling Are So Protective of Their Private World
What my $30 hamburger reveals about fees and how companies use them to jack up prices